I would tag that as:
oneway=yes lanes=3 lanes:psv=1 vehicle:lanes=yes|yes|no psv:lanes=yes|yes|designated parking:lane:left=parallel parking:condition:left=ticket sidewalk=both This sign clearly defines how many lanes there are and that it’s a psv lane (not just a bus lane): https://www.google.com.au/maps/@41.8976885,12.4654864,3a,17.5y,4.9h,90.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPA9cA6SFCm4EvIHqGgo--Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 The road markings near the intersection also make it clear how many lanes there are : https://www.google.com.au/maps/@41.8994254,12.4643407,3a,66.8y,356.59h,86.38t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sOEpzRTQFWoZi-4BndvycFg!2e0 (the leftmost lane here was the parking lane, which is not included in lanes=x) The parking tags probably need some more information, but I can’t read the signs on streetview, so that’s a job for a field survey. From: Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 11 May 2018 20:46 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes I would also find it misleading to tag situations with lanes=2 where there is a painted bus lane and the rest of the carriageway (wide enough for 2-3 lanes) has no separations, like here: https://www.google.com.au/maps/@41.8987442,12.4647371,3a,75y,156.28h,56.34t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sWEPSOplLQldMLooamvppkQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 Cheers, Martin OT: these are obviously not representative pictures of the road as they have probably been taken in the hottest period when everyone had left the city for a few days, usual conditions are like this https://static.fanpage.it/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/04/traffico-roma3-300x225.jpg and in case of problems something like this https://www.ilmessaggero.it/photos/HIGH/83/38/2098338_trafficoroma.jpg
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
