So far 2 people keep insisting that cycle lanes are counted and a larger number says no. AFAIK a non-OSM person will not count cycle lanes when asked to tell how many lanes a road has. I asked around on the Belgian OSM Riot Channel and immediately got 3 responses, to NOT count cycle lanes.
So please follow the wiki, create your own tag to include cycle lanes and hope that it will get traction. Why do you keep mistagging roads if you know the wiki tells you not to count cycle lanes? I see this as deliberate vandalism. I understand that you do not agree with the current definition, however I do not understand why you insist on putting an incorrect value in that tag. We have a free tagging schema, so it is easy to create a new tag for your purpose. regards m. On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 9:19 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Steve Doerr <doerr.step...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On 12/05/2018 12:04, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> >>> Actually, while I know about and abide to the wiki definition, I don't >>> think it is intuitive to count some lanes and other not. >> >> >> We do that because of a UN convention: >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2011-September/008578.html > > > Sure, and that was a pretty motorist-oriented convention, unsurprising since > its inception was in 1968. There's plenty of Vienna Convention countries > that have bicycle lanes now and even marked out lanes on ways only open to > bicycles, an increasing number of which have multiple bike lanes on the same > roadway in the same direction. So I'm pretty sure the idea has evolved a > bit in the intervening half century. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
