Le 18. 05. 18 à 21:17, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > 18. May 2018 21:03 by [email protected] > >> for ex unsigned=opening_hours > It would be problematic as soon as there is more than one unsigned > parameter.
we can use the common ";" separator for that unsigned=key1;key2;key3 for ex unsigned=housenumber;opening_hours >> or unsigned:opening_hours=yes (maybe strange due to "one only" value) > > Seems OK, but I still prefer opening_hours_sign=no - it seems simpler. of course it's simpler. but if every key have it's own logic, tools like streetcomplete need to build a long list of several "logic" in stead of being able to make one logic for all tag. unsigned=yes was already in use to said that a feature doesn't have a name (>1000 uses) I myself also use it on building to said that a building that should have a housenmber doesn't have an housenumber sign So it's easy to extend to have one-only schema for all related sign that faild to be found by survey. Regars, Marc _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
