Isn't that should-be tagging for the validator? I don't know if that's less frowned-upon than tagging for the renderer... Besides, if you derive the tag from your tagging tool, couldn't the validator do that directly?
2018-05-25 11:15 GMT+02:00 Jo <[email protected]>: > I tend to use roundtrip=yes when (after fixing) a route relation gets this > double way icon next to the ways, instead of a single vertical line (JOSM > only ofc). > > If we all start using it that way, we could create a validator rule for > checking the relation is still 'all right'. > > Polyglot > > 2018-05-25 11:10 GMT+02:00 Johnparis <[email protected]>: > >> Interesting. >> >> Similarly, a route that is not closed can be a roundtrip. The start and >> end points might be several meters apart, even on different roads, yet >> serve the same destination. There are a few (very few) examples I have >> found in the Paris area. Here's one. It's not marked roundtrip=yes but >> probably should be: >> >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8140184 >> >> I agree that this tag seems to be of very limited usefulness, though I >> confess to having used it on occasion. >> >> >> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:55 AM, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 25/05/18 15:48, Peter Elderson wrote: >>> >>> What is the use of the key:roundtrip? >>> Explanations just say >>> roundtrip <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roundtrip>=yes/no >>> (optional) >>> Use roundtrip=no to indicate that a route goes from A to B. Use >>> roundtrip=yes to indicate that the start and finish of the route are at the >>> same location (circular route). It seems rather pointless to tag an >>> obvious a-b route with roundtrip=no, or an abvious roundtrip with >>> roundtrip=yes. >>> Why would you tag an a-b route as roundtrip=yes, or a closed route as >>> roundtrip=no? >>> >>> >>> A route that is 'closed' can be a non round trip. >>> For example the bus only does one circuit then goes on to another route >>> elsewhere. This can be done to provide services to both that route and to >>> other parts of the community with other routes. >>> There may not be enough demand for a continuous circuit to be viable. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
