On 07/06/18 02:06, Andy Townsend wrote:
On 06/06/2018 16:38, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
6. Jun 2018 17:10 by kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com
<mailto:kevin.b.kenny+...@gmail.com>:
Nothing really fits "This land is used for production of forest
products"
So be tag should be invented by someone who cares about it.
I've used https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=forestry for
that, but almost no-one uses that (literally in single figures). See
e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370079612 and
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=16&lat=53.22166&lon=-1.18361
for an example rendering. If there's a better tagging option that
doesn't conflict with what's in OSM already I'm happy to be enlightened.
The same people who abused landuse=forest can and probably will abuse
landuse=forestry ...
The problem is in part caused by the renders showing both
landuse=forest/forestry the same as natural=wood/landcover=trees.
I would place a brown axe through the tree trunks in the rendering of
landuse=forest/forestry to clearly distinguish it.
The other part of the problem is natural=wood as some object to placing
anything that is not, if their terms, 'natural' in to the key natural.
The use of the key landcover satisfies this need for some of the values
in the key natural.
The values not covered would be covered by the key 'landform'.
In 'my ideal OSM world' the key natural would be abandoned for the keys
landform and landcover.
Once those are rendered then start on forest/forestry rendering that is
different from landcover=trees.
Best Regards,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
