On 12/06/18 08:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 8. Jun 2018, at 17:32, Kevin Kenny <[email protected]> wrote:
Is there 'correct' tagging for these areas, which are widespread in the areas
that I map and are important to the public?
there are 2 competing tags, leisure=nature_reserve and boundary protected area
for this kind of object. None of them states it is named after a forest, or
mainly covered by forest. Maybe this could become an additional property, e.g.
for protected_area objects?
Usually the administration boundary does not define the plants stopping or
starting at that same point.
So I prefer to define the plants with another relation/way rather than
artificially use the administration boundary.
Thus I use landcover=trees (with natural=wood for the moment to keep rendering)
for the tree areas - common around me and very extensive,
while the reserves and National Parks get different relations/ways for them.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
