You guys are hilarious. I actually helped Paull Allen with his questions on how to map that bus line. It's where the discussion about reverse role came from, by the way.
Anyway, I removed the stop_position nodes from the route relations yes. It shows that it's perfectly possible to map bus lines with nodes next to the highways and without having to duplicate information across 2 objects and then having to add both those objects to the route relations. In general the data was improved and Paul learned how he can map a complex bus line that does illogical things. If Paull feels it would be better to have those stop_postion nodes in the route relations anyway, he can add them back in. They dont add information though. Paul's concern was rather that the stops come first in the relation foloowed by the ways. He would prefer to add the stops sprinkled between the ways. I'm looking into how feasible that would be in JOSM. There is something to say for doig it that way, but only if there is support from the editor software. Because the reason why we have a long string of ways, is because now we get visual feedback that this sequence of ways is continuous. (or not) Anyway, I think we need to rethink how public transport should be mapped in OSM, as what we are doing right now is too compilcated and data needs to be duplicated between stop_position nodes and platform nodes/ways. I have been silent about this for years, from now on I will keep hammering on this. And to get back on topic changing the rendering of highway=platform or railway=platform on ways is not useful. Those are just fine the way they are. It's the platform nodes (previously highway=bus_stop) that we are concerned about. Jo (Polyglot) Op do 21 jun. 2018 om 17:47 schreef <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au>: > As I previously said, I would consider this vandalism. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> > > Sent: Friday, 22 June 2018 01:23 > > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] public_transport=platform rendering on osm- > > carto > > > > Le 21. 06. 18 à 16:27, Paul Allen a écrit : > > > Platforms are mapped but stop positions aren't (somebody who > > thinks > > > they shouldn't be there cleaned up after me). > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7620346 > > > > if want to known who destroy stop_position in the relation, look at > > version #18 changet 59355804 23 days ago. > > PS: Polyglot=Jo > > > > The destruction of perfectly valid tags is really a problematic > > behavior despite all the sympathy I have for Jo in many other > > threads. > > Fixing some stuff in a relationship does not need to destroy valid > > info that another mapper had added previously. > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging