Ok.. I’ve decided after talking to a few more people about this that I’m going to just support things in iD the best I can, and pull back from tagging discussions.
Thanks, Bryan > On Jun 24, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > >> On 24. Jun 2018, at 16:19, Bryan Housel <bhou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I can’t be any more clear than this: >> >> I will support `covered=yes/no` as a checkbox. >> I will support `booth=*` as a dropdown >> I won’t support `covered=booth` . > > > that’s all fine, but you should not retag the objects and should not change > the wiki as proposed above, it is not justified by the numbers and the way > things currently are tagged. Do you read what I write? You proposed to retag > 5000+ objects to a tag that is now 134 times used and where the value is > essentially an outlier among the other values for the key. > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
