Another alternative, without having to introduce a new value, would be access=designated.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:44 AM Stephen Doerr <[email protected]> wrote: > How about: > > amenity=place_of_worship > religion=muslim > access=adherents > > ? > > > On 29 June 2018, at 19:36, Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I thought about it but it is not clear that it refers to access. Also, it > would cause problems > for anybody processing popular tags (like access) and not processing very > rare new tags > (muslim). > > For example > > amenity=place_of_worship > muslim=yes > religion=muslim > access=no > > would be quite unclear, with muslim=yes looking like duplicate of > religion=muslim. > > 29. Jun 2018 20:32 by [email protected]: > > Maybe something like > > access=no > muslim=yes > > better fit the existing schemes for tagging access? > > > On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:27 AM, Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I thought about muslim_only=yes tag. > > > 27. Jun 2018 12:50 by [email protected]: > > Is there some established way to tag religion-based access restrictions? > > For example in Morocco only Muslims may enter a typical mosque. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
