Search in this list for "[Tagging] Manor tagging" around march 14th. The manor is the area around the house (la finca) The manor house it the house itself. Yours, José Moya
El 4/7/2018 12:36 PM, "César Martínez Izquierdo" <[email protected]> escribió: > Hi, > > I wonder the best way to tag Spanish historic farmhouses ("masías" > [1], "caseríos" [2] "cortijos", "pazos", etc), since I find no proper > value of "historic" for them. > > They are prominent buildings that are spread all over the country, > dating from at least the XVII century and in some cases having Roman > origins. Some of them are still used as farmhouses, but most of them > are abandoned or have a different use nowadays: museums, hotels, > private houses, etc. They had great importance in the past since they > were used to administer the fields surrounding them. Nowadays the are > relevant from the point of view of architecture and they are also > important landmarks in the rural areas. They are named (e.g. "Masía > Tristán") and its name has been extended to identify the area > surrounding them. > > I think that the best way is to tag their current use (e.g. > building=hotel, or building=civic+tourism=museum, etc) and then use > the "historic" tag to note they are a historic farmhouse. > > I see different options for the proper historic value. > > 1- historic=manor > 2- historic=farmhouse > 3- historic=masia, historic=cortijo, etc > > I wonder if option 1 (manor) is too specific to UK or it can be > applied also to these kind of building. > > OSM wiki states: "The manor tag is intended only for representative > buildings that are in the same time the administrative center of a > large agricultural estate. Buildings lacking this economic feature > should not be tagged.". > > Regarding option 2, this would be a new value for historic, and I am > not sure it will really catch the historic relevance of the building. > We don't tag it as historic because it was a farmhouse, but because of > its architecture and historic relevance in administering the lands > surrounding it. > > The 3rd option (using different values for each kind building) looks a > bit overkilling, since there are many different names (masía, > alquería, cortijo, caserío, pazo, cigarral, quinta, carmen, etc, etc) > and this would create too much tag fragmentation. > > Finally, there is also historic=farm, but it does not fit in this case > according its definition. > > Opinions? > > César Martínez > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masia > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baserri > [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cortijo > [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pazo > > > > -- > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > César Martínez Izquierdo > GIS developer > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > SCOLAB: http://www.scolab.es > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
