:-) Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 17:07, Simon Poole <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > > Am 03.08.2018 um 16:30 schrieb djakk djakk: > > I think it is less verbose. > > That isn't necessarily a positive (just as in programming languages). > > > There can be multiple ways to express something in osm, like in the Ruby > language ? > > While that is certainly the case in OSM, introducing alternative tagging > just to make things difficult is likely not going to make anybody happy. > > > Simon > > > > djakk > > > Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 16:21, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> while this might work, why would you try to replace an established >> tagging system ? >> The tagging system turn:lanes:xxx is supported by several data >> consumers (OsmAnd, maps.me, MagicEarth and probably others). >> In many countries people worked on tagging all roads with this system >> after a project set up by the German community. >> >> m. >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:10 PM djakk djakk <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hello ! >> > >> > What about a tagging method like this : >> > >> > lanes=3 >> > lane_2=forward_direction;left_turn >> > >> > or >> > >> > lanes=3 >> > lane_2:direction=forward >> > lane_2:turn=left >> > >> > instead of >> > >> > lanes=3 >> > lanes:forward=2 >> > turn:lanes:forward=left|through >> > >> > ? >> > >> > >> > djakk >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Le ven. 3 août 2018 à 13:13, Lionel Giard <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >> >> >> If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging ( >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a >> suggested way of tagging (in "Examples/Motorways") is using letter to >> indicate which lane goes to where (when there is a transition). This could >> be used to extent the width tagging for transition lane (where one lane >> split to two (or conversely). There are already a lot of possibility to tag >> detailed lanes, but we could indeed add the width in it ! >> >> >> >> PS: sorry for the previous message, i miss-clicked. >> >> >> >> 2018-08-03 13:08 GMT+02:00 Lionel Giard <[email protected]>: >> >>> >> >>> If you look at the wiki page about different lanes tagging ( >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes ), you can see that a >> suggested w >> >>> >> >>> 2018-08-02 23:56 GMT+02:00 Tom Hardy <[email protected]>: >> >>>> >> >>>> I've experimented a bit with lane and road attributes as in >> >>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505256201 and the adjoining >> intersection. >> >>>> No width, but number, function and placement of lanes. For >> placement, I >> >>>> always selected the center of the throughway. This allows renderers >> that pay >> >>>> no attention to lane attributes to render a straight line through an >> >>>> intersection. >> >>>> >> >>>> JOSM's "Enhanced lane and road attributes" visualizer shows this >> quite well. >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Tom Hardy <[email protected]> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Tagging mailing list >> >>>> [email protected] >> >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Tagging mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Tagging mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
