Il giorno mar 7 ago 2018 alle ore 18:37 peterkrauss < [email protected]> ha scritto:
> > > > > Using route or site relations when appropriate is a good solution. > > Ok, lets elect the OSM Map Features that are Wikidata-good-solutions > > * "type=boundary" (6,525,236 elements) > > * "type=route" (30,257,877 elements!) and complements as > "type=route_master". > > * ... more good solutions? > > AssociatedStreet suggests to collect the etymology of the road name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet > > PS: "type=site" was classified with status "abandoned", at > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
