Hi I'd rather use addr:place="Square Name" in that case. In don't agree that addr:place is 'intended for larger objects like "villages, islands, territorial zones"'. I also use addr:place e.g. for settlements (place=neighbourhood) or hamlets, if there is no street with the addresses' name (example: [^1]).
[^1]: <http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=7.59448&lat=47.54290&zoom=18&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way> Regards Markus On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 21:05, Toggenburger Lukas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > I'm the main author of the address view of Geofabrik's OSM inspector: > http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses , a QA tool for OSM, whose > sourcecode you can find at https://github.com/ltog/osmi-addresses/ > > Some time ago I received the following issue and subsequent pull request: > > - https://github.com/ltog/osmi-addresses/issues/111 > - https://github.com/ltog/osmi-addresses/pull/115 > > The submitter johsin18 proposes the following: > > Given a (node|way) with addr:street=theName and a (node|way) with > place=square, name=theName, the first object should logically be tied to the > second. Correspondingly, osmi-addresses should recognize this and not display > it as an error as it is currently the case, e.g. at: > http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=7.59448&lat=47.54290&zoom=18&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way > > osmi-addresses currently expects either > addr:street=* used in combination with highway=*, name=* > or > addr:place=* used in combination with place=*, name=* > > Both myself and the current maintainer of osmi-addresses (=Nakaner) are > unsure if this proposed change would be appreciated by the larger public or > not. We are therefore seeking your opinion. > > Best regards > > Lukas > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
