oh okay yeah i get it! On Aug 17 2018, at 4:17 pm, Jmapb <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/16/2018 6:39 PM, seirra wrote: > > if a floor of a building is for example: a store at the bottom of the > > building, and the rest is apartments... shouldn't it then be a > > building labelled as a chemist, with the tag level=0 and at the same > > point on the map, a building labelled as apartments with the tag level=1? > > Usually this would be mapped as a node (point) for the shop, set inside > the perimeter of the building. The node gets tagged with all the > information specific for the shop (name, phone, opening_hours, etc.) The > building area gets tagged with all of the physical attributes of the > building (height, building style, sometimes the building has its own > name that it keeps regardless of what shop is occupying the ground > floor.) The address tags would also generally go on the building itself > -- unless the building has multiple addresses. > > We definitely don't want two buildings at the same location to indicate > the two different uses of a single building. It is possible to draw an > area for the bottom floor shop instead of a node -- just tag the area as > a shop, not as a building. And add the level=0 tag, as you mentioned. > (And it probably wouldn't be the *entire* bottom floor of course; you'd > want to leave room for the stairs for instance.) > > The general rule is *not* to map any specifics of private areas of > buildings -- the apartments on the upper floors, for instance. You can > use the building:units= tag to indicate the number of apartments, and > addr:flats= tag to list the apartment numbers, but that's generally as > far as we go. > > J > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
