I would use both lanes=x+1 (where x is the number of lanes without turnout section) and something like
turnout:lanes=no|no|yes|yes (if there are 2 turn out lanes) and lanes:turnout=1 (or 2, or 3) this is similar to tagging deficated bus lanes On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:37 AM SelfishSeahorse <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > I'd propose to tag the section of the road with the turnout (or alternatively > just a node) turnout:<left/right/both>=yes. > > I would neither use a lane key nor a separate highway=service way, because > slow vehicle turnouts aren't lanes for moving traffic and because a separate > highway way would give the wrong impression that the turnout were physically > separated from the other lanes. > > Regards > Markus > > On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 12:31 Dave Swarthout, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm still trying to cook up a scheme where those pullouts can be added as a >> way and then tagged in a manner that reveals their purpose and function. The >> use of lanes may indeed be the most correct approach but to my way of >> thinking, it doesn't communicate the purpose of the "extra" lane very well. >> Because the turnouts use a separate lane, are very short in length, and are >> not really thoroughfares in the usual sense, might it be logical to tag them >> as service roads? As an example: >> highway=service >> service=slow_vehicle_turnout (or slow_vehicle_lane) >> lanes=1 >> oneway=yes >> >> Opinions? Observations? >> >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:16 AM Kevin Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 4:11 PM Dave Swarthout <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >We also have the occasional spot like >>> > >https://orthos.dhses.ny.gov/?Extent=-8283718.624472891,5242597.149663145,-8283317.927238801,5242833.029555047&Layers=2017_cache,2016_cache,2015_cache,2014_cache,2013_cache >>> > >There, we have an extra lane on the northbound side for the purpose of >>> > >getting by when the way is blocked by left-turning traffic >>> > >>> > My case is almost identical to the above illustration, except to >>> > substitute the words "slow moving vehicles" for "left turning traffic". I >>> > reckon I could use the lanes tagging but like Kevin, I have many "other >>> > fish to fry" which is why I'm still looking for a simple >>> > one-tag-fixes-all solution. >>> >>> My guess is that the slow-moving traffic is supposed to pull over into >>> the outer lane, allowing the parade behind to pass on the inside, >>> rather than the through traffic passing on the outer lane? That's >>> like my first case, except that in that particular case, the climbing >>> lane goes on for several km (the highway is gaining a few hundred >>> metres of elevation up the Helderberg escarpment). We do have ones >>> that are more like pullouts rather than long lanes. There's a shorter >>> one on the westbound carriageway in >>> https://orthos.dhses.ny.gov/?Extent=-8267325.730037971,5268580.377261018,-8265722.941101252,5269523.896828834&Layers=2017_cache,2016_cache,2015_cache,2014_cache,2013_cache >>> >>> By contrast, although the section is short, the outer westbound lane >>> in >>> https://orthos.dhses.ny.gov/?Extent=-8244541.671667748,5187738.535180551,-8244140.974433658,5187974.415072453&Layers=2017_cache,2016_cache,2015_cache,2014_cache,2013_cache >>> is NOT a climbing lane. It's set off by a single broken line, and >>> traffic is expected to keep to the right except to pass. >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Swarthout >> Homer, Alaska >> Chiang Mai, Thailand >> Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
