On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 11:17, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm still not convinced the lanes:smv tagging scenario is the best solution > but were I to change my mind, how would I tag my turnouts? Here is another > screen shot of the particular section of highway with a turnout on both sides > of the road that I've been discussing (59.752103, -151.766395 ) with the ways > removed for clarity: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/nm6iahw9ch79tuh/slow_vehicle_turnout.jpg?dl=0
I would probably split the road at every place where an additional lane begins or ends, i.e. four times, and would tag the sections as follows from right to left (this is the direction of the highway way): lanes=2 lanes=3 lanes:forward=2 lanes:backward=1 smv:lanes:forward=|designated overtaking:lanes:forward=yes|no lanes=4 lanes:forward=2 lanes:backward=2 smv:lanes:forward=|designated smv:lanes:backward=|designated overtaking:lanes:forward=yes|no overtaking:lanes:backward=yes|no lanes=3 lanes:forward=1 lanes:backward=2 smv:lanes:backward=|designated overtaking:lanes:backward=yes|no lanes=2 In case the turnouts were separated by a barrier, i think your idea with highway=service + service=slow_vehicle_turnout would make sense. Regards Markus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
