On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 1:38 AM Dave Swarthout <[email protected]> wrote: > > The discussion about the definition of "reach" is interesting but IMO it's > slightly off topic. Perhaps, because of those differences in its > interpretation, we would be best served by not using the term at all.
Except that I would like to see flowlines in the US tagged with their 'reach code', which is a numeric identifier in NHD and other sources that is intended to serve as permanent idenfitication for a particular waterway. Those cross reference to enough places that carrying the information is useful. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
