>Hi Alberto, >Nice to see you back there :) >Regarding check_date, I'd go in favor of operational_status:date. >working:* is too specific to fully functional hydrants, what about disused or >dry ones? >Then operational_status is a more complete solution to give state and >associated date. >All the best >François
Nice to see you too, Francois :) Well I proposed working_test:date only because it is already in use for hydrants. On the other hand, operational_status is used more often, although operational_status:date has only 1 occurence. Shall we go on discussion page [1]? Even Marc preferred operational status, as reported on [1]. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions_(part_3) Best regards, Alberto --- Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
