2. Oct 2018 05:15 by [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>:
>> >> >> >> - this data is basically not usable. >> > Sure it is. Say I want to know what amenities an RV park has in another > city...you could go "hey, what does Somewhereville RV Park have?" or just > throw Somewhereville RV Park and get a list of everything that belongs to the > same site. Dump station, fuel pump, convenience store, information stand, > mailboxes, laundry, showers, toilets...regardless of whether or not these > things are named or not, or even share the same name as the RV park itself. > Like, say, "Old Faceful Geyser" (actually a splashpad) in the "Jellystone > Park" RV park at Lake Eufaula (to use something I might try if I was taking > my boyfriend and niece truck camping and wasn't actually familiar with this > being a delightfully furry, yet corny, and relatively comfortable for cheap > truck-tent camping). I am not sure how it requires a site relation. Mapping feature as a polygon is sufficient tomark objects inside this polygon as, well, inside the polygon. In rare cases of holes/disjointed areas multipolygon is needed.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
