This relation combines a number of cave entrances the belong to the same system that is apparantly protected: http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/translate/en/index-en.html?zoom=16&lat=50.67804&lon=7.22231&layers=B0000FT&detail=3 On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:08 PM Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2. Październik 2018 12:36 od [email protected]: > > Le 02. 10. 18 à 11:46, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > > Can you link this case if that is more complicated? > it's a fictional example. ok not the better one. > > take again the example you cut in the initial message: > a wind turbin site with a few turbines represented by a few nodes > I hope your solution is not to make a way for each wind turbine > to be able to add in into a multipolygon to describe the site. > it would not make much sense to make a polygon encompassing all objects > between the wind turbines and describe that the whole thing is a wind site > > > I agree that for wind turbines multipolygon may not be feasible. > > > So far it is the only known to me case where site relation maybe is useful > > (I have no experience with features like wind turbine farms so it is hard > > for me to judge this case - that is why I skipped it). > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
