On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 at 09:12, Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 10:46:08PM +0200, SelfishSeahorse wrote: > > On Friday, October 5, 2018, Florian Lohoff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is there tagging to let announcements ignore that flare? > > > > I think that if the driveway is tagged highway=service, this should be > > enough information for the routeing engine to ignore it. Besides there > > might be people that don't want the driveway to be ignored. > > What about roundabouts only with services? Private property, military, > industrial complexes? No voice guidance there?
The voice guidance could tell you to take the xth service exit. Or in your example [1] if you come from SW on Groppeler Straße and want to go into the driveway, it could announce: 'take the service exit next to the 2nd exit' or 'drive into the driveway next to the 2nd exit'. [1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.90770/8.26519 Apparently, OSMR already skips service roads when counting roundabout exits. In that example, travelling from SW to NW, it says: 'At roundabout take 3rd exit onto Tecklenburger Weg'. However, when travelling from SW into the driveway, it also counts the driveway as 3rd exit: 'At roundabout take 3rd exit onto unnamed road'. This could be optimised. > I rather go for an explicit tagging to exclude flares in counting as > long as you dont enter or leave the roundabout at that road. In my opinion all the information for the routing engines is already there -- i don't know how this should be tagged differently. Regards Markus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
