If there is an issue with something merged too fast into iD, I guess that the devs could welcome a revert. Yves
Le 11 octobre 2018 11:19:33 GMT+02:00, marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> a écrit : >Le 10. 10. 18 à 21:22, yo paseopor a écrit : >> avoid problems with new iD editor as an agreement on tagging list" > >> mechanical edit > >this is the main problem with the current way of doing things: >a dev has a problem and it turns into a hidden mass edit, poorly >documented compared to community habits and therefore the only goal >seems to be to be able to close a ticket within the week. > >for my part I no longer participate in these discussions given the >strange conception of the community (I still saw it with the proposal >of >the permit. the propal was still under discussion, the meaning not yet >finalized that it was already merged in iD... so what is the point of >continuing to discuss the problem if the dev is above the community?) > >I would be delighted if this message could be used to put an end to >this >problem so that we can improve the quality even if it will sometimes >take more time than a week. > >Regards, >Marc >_______________________________________________ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
