On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 10:27:01 +1100 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23/10/18 05:04, Yves wrote: > > Daniel, Mateusz and others: if nobody care to review those sub > > stations, this means they need care. > > That's more a concern than an old tag in the DB. > > You want them re tagged, then advertise for this and bring other > > people into this, like in 'build a community' . > > Or do it automatically and let them rot. > > If nobody cares then a simply auto edit. These same nobodies will not > care if any errors of the past get replicated into the future. > > Of the ones I have just reviewed, some 56 of them - 2 were potential > errors .. one looks to have been caused by an automatic edit that was > then incorrectly reverted .. not certain what happens there! There > other looks to be a human error .. a turning circle and a substation > on the same node? > > So about a 4% error rate if unchecked. It is a small sample size .. > so an error rate of, say, 8% could be forecast? 4-8% seems about right. Of the 29 "power=station" that I just checked, two are probably substations, but might be small-scale generating plants instead, while two didn't look like part of the power infrastructure at all. Since I couldn't tell from aerial imagery what the correct tag was, I left all four at the clearly incorrect "power=station" so that a future user could easily identify what needs work. -- Mark _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
