On 10/31/2018 3:11 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > > If the consensus is that "other" sucks as an option I'm certainly > open to other suggestions, but we need something for diplomatic > missions headed by neither an ambassador/charge d'affaires (i.e., > subject to the VCDR) nor a consul (i.e., subject to the VCCR). > > diplomatic=minor_mission? If there's neither a consul nor an > ambassador, it must be somehow minor ;-) > Nobody wants to be called "minor" in diplomacy. Wars have been fought over lesser insults. If that's the only other suggestion, then my proposal will remain "other" :-o The head of the OSCE mission here in Ashgabat is a former ambassador and will certainly take umbrage with me if her mission is somehow described as "minor". > > if these are all exclusive, it could also be: > > amenity=[embassy, consulate, minor_mission] > I think we are past the point of calling diplomatic missions "amenity". We're now down to either "office=diplomatic" or "diplomatic=*" There has been broad consensus expressed that diplomatic missions are not amenities.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
