On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 12:27:57AM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: > Are we talking a 1 lane or a 3 lane road? Because that looks like it's > describing a 3 lane road.
looks like 1 lane to me but the example would not work for other reasons. We could do lanes=0 # this is "default" for routers/apps which don't undrestand/use conditional # restrictions lanes:forward:conditional=2 @ (09:00-17:00) lanes:backward:conditional=2 @ (17:01-8:59) # the version for apps which do understand them However, I am afraid that "lanes=0" won't stop most routers sending cars that way, other kind of restriction is needed here. That could be access=no access=yes @ (09:00-17:00); yes @ (17:01-8:59) # this two lines are needed to sort out routers/apps which don't # undrestand/use conditional oneway:conditional= yes @ (09:00-17:00); -1 @ (17:01-8:59) In principle oneway=reversible oneway:conditional= yes @ (09:00-17:00); -1 @ (17:01-8:59) would be a much more elegant solution but again, I am afraid that oneway=reversible isnt widespread enough to be known by most routers. I have just added that as hypothetical example to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway%3Dreversible The lane number could be added on top of that - and would be very confusing if it were variable because there would be backward/forward lanes on top of reversible oneway.. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
