On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:16 AM André Pirard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jakka's point is not that "url" is used but that it could be wanted and > that this usage would prevent it. > To prevent the "first jumping on it owns it" practice, the good move would > be to consider that anything:url is *officially* an URL. > "being officially" meaning principally that listings make it a clickable > link. > Even though any URL can be recognized inside any text and made clickable. > But I've had problems suggesting to make multiple tags containing URLs > clickable. > The answer was: "the URL tag exists already" ;-) > For whatever it's worth (probably not much), when I imported the New York City DEP recreation lands data, most of the facilities had multiple URL's - the main URL for the facility, the URL for the facility's official map, the URL for the site where permits can be obtained (if permits are required)... At the time, JOSM warned me about 'url' and proffered 'website' in its place, so I went with that in place of 'url'. For the secondary sites (map, permit service, ...) I used 'website:map', 'website:permit', etc. The tools appear to recognize it - at least when I call up a place like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6304825, the URL's render appropriately as links. I may have got it all wrong, but nobody corrected me on talk-us or imports at the time.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
