So... how many tags will this node have, once you have tagged all of its components?
From [1 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_transceiver_station>]: > A *BTS *is usually *composed of*: > > Transceiver (TRX) > Provides transmission and reception of signals. It also does sending and > reception of signals to and from higher network entities (like the base > station controller <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_station_controller> in > mobile telephony). > Power amplifier (PA) > Amplifies the signal from TRX for transmission through antenna; may be > integrated with TRX. > Combiner > Combines feeds from several TRXs so that they could be sent out through a > single antenna. Allows for a reduction in the number of antenna used. > Multiplexer > For separating sending and receiving signals to/from antenna. Does > sending and receiving signals through the same antenna ports (cables to > antenna). > Antenna > This is the structure that the BTS lies underneath; it can be installed > as it is or disguised in some way (Concealed cell sites > <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Concealed_cell_sites&action=edit&redlink=1>). > Alarm extension system > Collects working status alarms of various units in the BTS and extends > them to operations and maintenance (O&M) monitoring stations. > Control function > Controls and manages the various units of BTS, including any software. > On-the-spot configurations, status changes, software upgrades, etc. are done > through the control function. > Baseband receiver unit (BBxx) > Frequency hopping, signal DSP. > Mapping each component (/yes, the antenna too.../) separatly doesn't make much sense to me... Sergio [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_transceiver_station On 2018-11-24 17:59, François Lacombe wrote: > "BTS" is another object and differ from antennas since the antennas are > connected to BTS/nodeB/eNodeB. > > Both can be mapped with telecom=* and BTS will often get > man_made=street_cabinet > > Recently reviewed Telecom=service_device is suitable for "BTS" cabinets with > telecom:medium=radio and aditional tags for 3GPP technology 2G/3G or LTE. > > Several antennas can be fed by a single radio cabinet > > François > > Le sam. 24 nov. 2018 à 15:51, Sergio Manzi <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > a écrit : > > I like it! > > To me it makes much more sense to tag telecom=BTS (Base Transceiver > Station, see [1 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_transceiver_station>]) > than man_made:antenna + antenna:type=whatever. > > But BTS is not indicated as possible value for telecom=* in the wiki... > > Cheers, > > Sergio > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_transceiver_station > > > On 2018-11-24 15:22, François Lacombe wrote: >> Hi all >> It would be great to use telecom=* instead of man_made or communications >> >> Antennas is a difgicult topic to address in osm since there can be many >> of them at the same time. They should be distinguished from mast and >> supports since antennas are only devices >> >> All the best >> >> François >> >> Le sam. 24 nov. 2018 à 14:59, Joseph Eisenberg >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : >> >> I’d been thinking about this lately while working on towers and >> radio telescopes. >> >> Towers can be tagged with tower:construction =dish and this is >> rendered as “satellite” dish sending or receiving waves, in the >> Openstreetmap-Carto style. >> >> Radio telescopes are now rendered as well. >> >> But there are some satellite uplink dishes mistagged as radio >> telescopes. >> >> Other tags in use are man_made=communications_dish and >> man_made=satellite_dish >> >> But neither is very well documented, I recall. >> >> I’d be happy to have a better way to tag these dishes. >> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 9:52 PM Paul Allen <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 1:48 AM Warin <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I was looking at the wiki for antennas >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dantenna >> >> >> I made some additions to the definition and added some >> photos etc. >> >> It is still rather sparse. I'd like to be able to further >> define what the antenna is. >> >> I have some pictures of various antennas in my area. Well, >> they're pictures of masts but the >> antennas are sometimes discernible. Any idea for a good place >> to dump them so they can >> contribute to antenna/mast examples that people can add to wiki >> pages as appropriate? >> >> Worst case, you want me to mail them to you and you can decide >> what to do with them? >> >> >> -- >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
