On 08/01/19 02:53, Konrad Lischka wrote:
Hello,
the proper tagging of kindergarten grounds in Germany really makes me
think.
The problem: We have a lot of operators that are independent
charitable entities (for example registered associations see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_association_(Germany)
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_association_%28Germany%29> but belong to charitable
organisation too like Caritas or Paritätischer.
My solution would be:
amenity=kindergarten
operator=[Name of theregistered association]
operator:type=charitable
organisation=[organisation name like Caritas]
What do you think?
Two points:
(1) operator:type
=charitable is hardly used
(https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=charitable)
=private_non_profit
<https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=private_non_profit> seems
more common
(https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/operator%3Atype=private_non_profit)
but it is not the same. In Germany the tax authorities give the
charitable status only to some organisation based on a few defined
areas of work in the social or educational field. Non-Profis are more
commons, but not the same.
(2) organisation=
The use seems to be rather uncodified
The is no https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:organisation
alltough there is some use:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/organisation
Many shops and fuel station are operated by some remote entity too. OSM
uses "brand" for that.
Not certain that fits here but it is a similar situation?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
