On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 09:09, Markus <selfishseaho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It certainly can be phrased better (this isn't my strong point), but i > wanted to make it clear that a peninsula can also be part of a bigger > peninsula. > OK, how about "A natural=cape can be part of a natural=peninsula, a natural=peninsula can be part of a larger natural=peninsula, but a natural=peninsula cannot be part of a natural=cape"? I've updated the proposal accordingly. > Good, thanks, but that also raises an awkward (& unanswerable?) question about "Please do not map very large peninsulas like subcontinents as multipolygons as they strain the servers too much and are hard to maintain"? How big is "too much strain" & who can say it's straining too much? Is Cape York Peninsula OK, but Italy too big? How can anybody tell? BTW I'm in no way complaining or objecting to the idea (I'll be voting for it when it get's there!), it's just the question of the technical limitations that may be involved? Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
