Yes it makes sense to keep this distinction : level tag can just be the "logical order" of levels going from -xx to xx with an arbitrary 0 for each building, so tools know the order (which one is above the other). Simple Indoor Tagging already suggest the level:ref for the "local" naming scheme. It could be used by tools when they show you the name of the level in their interface (One example : a building with tags "level=0" + "level:ref=Ground floor", instead of showing "level 0", the tool can display "Ground floor" -> both the data user and the data consumers are happy ;-) ).
Le lun. 21 janv. 2019 à 09:20, PanierAvide <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hello, > > Just for your information, there is also this "level:ref" tag which was > used in various context to solve this problem : > > - level tag is still used as defined in Simple Indoor Tagging > - level:ref has a value which is linked to operator naming of levels > > That way, casual mappers/consumers don't need to stick to level definition > which doesn't make regarding operator naming, they can set level:ref > according to what they are used to see. And we keep the level definition > which makes more sense for tools. > > Regards, > > Adrien. > > PanierAvide > Géomaticien et développeur > > Le 21/01/2019 à 09:05, Simon Poole a écrit : > > As tordanik has already pointed out the main issue with the proposals is > that there is no inherent ordering that can be deduced from level values > on objects if they are not (integer) numbers, so any such scheme > requires far more insight, effort and available context from > joe-casual-mapper and joe-casual-data-consumer to get layering right. > With the current scheme that is a no-brainer even if there are > discrepancies between actual numbering of the floors and what is being > used in OSM. > > Simon > > PS: addr tags are for postal addresses I don't think using them as a > level name/ref makes very much sense outside of that very narrow > application. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
