On 04.02.2019 08:51, Frederik Ramm wrote:
* invent keys - ok
* document widely used/established keys that never went through a
proposal process - ok
* invent keys and document them as if they were widely used or
established - questionable
* the whole thing done by someone who has in the past unilaterally
documented their personal preferred tagging on the wiki, then made
mechanical edits to push it through, and when challenged in changeset
comments, cited the wiki pages they had edited themselves as an
authority - ...
It is particularly questionable in this case to mark the documentation as "approved", and include a
proposal link to a proposal for a different scheme (i.e. mountainbiking). While any other user could
have convinced me that this was a copy/paste oversight, with the history of a user who had staged a
fake voting in the past I can only conclude it was intentional.
tom
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
