Wrong thread? Anyway, the quest in StreetComplete only asks for foot=yes/no if the road is tagged with sidewalk=no.
On 14/02/2019 15:44, Volker Schmidt wrote: > ... and just to make this even trickier: > The access tag is (in most cases) about legal access, and not about > is-it-a-good-idea-to-route-a-pedestrian-along-this-road access. > That has to be underlined. In my part of the world most roads, even with > a lot of traffic and without sidewalk are legally open to pedestrians, > but if they take the road their chance of survival is low. > Add to the mix that, in my part of the world, almost all roads have no > sidewalk tag nor separate parallel footways, even if these are present. > I don't think it's a good idea to add foot=yes to underline what is > already the default. It would make more sense to tag foot=use_sidepath > for those cases where there is a sidewalk _and_ pedestrians a legally > required to use it, and use, obviously, foot=no for those cases where > there it is against the law to walk on the street (for roads where the > default is foot=yes) > > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 14:49, Tobias Zwick <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I don't take dismissive and generalizing statements on a project I have > been putting 3+ years of lifeblood into, invest much of my free time in > and offer as open source for the betterment of OSM, lightly. > > If you have a concrete constructive suggestion to make, do it, > otherwise, save your breath. > > Tobias > > On 14/02/2019 11:45, Wiklund Johan wrote: > > I think that apps adding redundant tags to cover for a tiny number > of special cases is going to cause more problems than it solves > (i.e. users misinterpreting the question and adding "private" access > to all kinds of roads). StreetBloat instead of StreetComplete :) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] > > Sent: torsdag 14. februar 2019 10.36 > > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > Subject: Re: [Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential > > > > > > > > sent from a phone > > > >> On 14. Feb 2019, at 10:26, Florian Lohoff <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> All residentials are accessible to pedestrians so i a bit puzzled > what > >> this challenge is good for. It just adds redundant tags to all roads. > > > > > > I agree the default is accessibility for everyone on non-motorroad > roads. There might be residential roads with private access (in the > occasions I met where access was private I was tending towards > service, although with general public access I would have called > them residentials). > > > > Cheers, Martin > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > _______________________________________________ > > Tagging mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
