On 15/02/19 00:36, Ulrich Lamm wrote:
Am 14.02.2019 um 12:51 schrieb [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>:
If you can justify it within your own tortured logic about
copyright, you can even use the
OSM database as a foundation for your efforts.
Openstreetmap is present, almost everywhere.
On some kinds of contents, Openstreetmap is full of of gaps and mistakes.
One has the choice to accept that like a fate, or to try to improve
Openstreetmap.
Improvement in detail is filling gaps and correcting mistakes.
Improvement in principle is pleading for rules that do not prevent
scientific standard
and supporting a development of OSM's social structures towards democracy.
OSM is constrained by making the output data really and truly free for
all users.
What you are trying to do will restrict the output data of OSM.
Is that an 'improvement'?
------------------------------------------------------
Deal with the principle issue. Errors/mistakes/accuracy and added data
are side issues.
-----------------------------------------
If someone does not want to see the messages of one or more contributors
they are free to do so. Just as they are free not to read a thread.
Ulrich contributions break the social norms by using the digest as the
subject title thus breaking any possibility to organise the threads into
a sequence.
This is unsocial to all.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
