> On Feb 13, 2019, at 4:25 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> man_made=incinerator
Thanks everyone for all the feedback. I will tag them as a
man_made=incinerator.
Then, shouldn’t we be tagging *all of these* as man_made=incinerators? (power
and non-power generating alike?)
There shouldn’t be any key/value incompatibility.
for a modern incinerator complex which handles both burnable and unburnable
waste:
man_made=incinerator
power=generator
generator:source=waste
amenity=waste_transfer_station
(in fact, the only conflict I see is that amenity=recycling &
amenity=waste_transfer_station can’t be on the same landuse, which is an often
shared job here in Japan, but that is for another day).
I feel this should be the main tag for all incinerators. if they produce power
via a form of waste disposal, then the additional power generation tags should
be added.
There are obviously power plants (and other industrial processes) that are
purpose-built to use unrecyclable waste as a fuel (tire-burning smelters, etc),
but all of these incinerators around me are primarily for getting rid of the
garbage generated by a city.
I feel we should clarify the tagging scheme to tag *all* these incinerators as
man_made=incinerator and add the power generation when necessary.
Javbw
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
