On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 13:32, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 11:25 Fernando Trebien <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I never thought that emergency access would determine highway >> classification. It seems like a secondary use of the way, not its main >> use/purpose. > > motor_vehicle=no would exclude most emergency vehicles.
I thought we were saying access tags like motor_vehicle are legal access, not physical access. I do not expect emergency vehicles to be excluded by legal access tags. IMHO, only if it physically can't fit, set width/maxwidth:physical or maxweight or surface on the way. Or do I have this wrong? > MI 185 isn't a pedestrian road, though, it's the main state highway through > town and just wandering out into traffic from the sidewalk or shoulder could > get you hit by human or horse powered vehicles. This however is a fair point. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
