On 28.02.19 16:15, Rory McCann wrote: > What about `sleepable:physical=yes/no`? It's clear that it's about "can > you *physically* sleep on this bench".
Seems sufficiently verifiable and neutral to me. If we're going with a single-purpose tag, it's a good candidate. I don't think it's the best possible solution, though. As mentioned on Reddit, I prefer tags that have more than one use case. Information about the physical properties of a bench can be used by sleepers, but also by those looking for benches with armrests that help them get back up, for 3d models, etc. A dedicated "sleepable" tag is not useful for anything else. > Tagging > armrests might be interesting, but it doesn't answer the question of > "can someone physically sleep here (and has it been modified/designed to > prevent that)". It doesn't answer that question on its own, but it does when combined with other tags (e.g. for non-horizontal surfaces). Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
