Feb 28, 2019, 6:48 PM by [email protected]: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:29 PM Janko Mihelić <> [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >> >> čet, 28. velj 2019. u 14:15 Martin Koppenhoefer <>> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> > napisao je: >> >> I agree, but we have a practical problem with people that think that this: >> https://images.mapillary.com/QQXg40ewDRF6hsi0jNGhzA/thumb-2048.jpg >> <https://images.mapillary.com/QQXg40ewDRF6hsi0jNGhzA/thumb-2048.jpg> >> >> cannot be tagged the same as this: >> https://images.mapillary.com/53iC9URhRKV_gYsxbF4ZYw/thumb-2048.jpg >> <https://images.mapillary.com/53iC9URhRKV_gYsxbF4ZYw/thumb-2048.jpg> >> >> People look at the first photo as a little street, not as a footway. It also >> probably has a name xx street. >> Both are really footways, but the resemblance ends there. I think adding >> footway=alley to the first one would make sense to people, and maybe then >> they will stop with wrong tagging. >> > > So, if width alone is used as criterion to distinguish between > highway=footway and highway=pedestrian > That is certainly not sole (or even the most important part). For reducto ad absurdum: what about way that changes width and is going below and above limit? Split it and alternate pedestrian and footway?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
