On 2019-03-02 09:49, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > Mar 2, 2019, 2:05 AM by [email protected]: > > I really-really-really like to know of a place where emergency vehicles > are *legally *not allowed to go... > > And if there isn't such a place, why do we need ""? > > And if we don't have such a need, why do we need "emergency=yes"? > > Because a given road is *accessible *to a emergency vehicles? > > Apparently people like to explicitly tag in some situations.
The problem (/as I see it.../) is that it isn't clear at all what they are trying to explicitly tag. Once a again: * a legal right? Absurd, as emergency vehicles always have that right. * physical accessibility? Absurd, as it doesn't state to which kind of vehicles (/small police car or humongous fire truc//k?/). IMHO emergency=yes and emergency=no should be deprecated, as simple as that. If there are physical restrictions (/weight, width, height/), tag that. > Though in all cases when I used it I should be using emergency=designated > (road was signed as firefighter access road or main ambulance access at the > hospital). ... and that's a different story, because this is valuable information for non-emergency vehicles: "you can't go there!" Sergio
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
