For me there is a significant difference between "mappers adopted using this tag, usage tripled in a year" "single import is source of almost all new instances of this tag"
Second is not indicating that mappers are using this tag. Mar 6, 2019, 12:29 PM by [email protected]: > If it's an import (not zutomated edit) and the import is ok then it's regular > usage. > > Vr gr Peter Elderson > > > Op wo 6 mrt. 2019 om 09:55 schreef Mateusz Konieczny <> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >: > >> >> >> >> Mar 5, 2019, 1:47 PM by >> [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>> : >> >>> Landcover now has about 170 000 usage count. >>> >>> Still growing rapidly despite not yet being rendered on OSM Carto. >>> >>> I would say that is enough reason to start renderin landcover on OSM Carto >>> and other renderings. >>> >> I run a quick check, nearly 100% of explosive growth[1] in 2018 >> is result of import in a Paraguay[2]. >> >> It is great evidence that raw usage count is not a perfect metric. >> >> From quick look there is nothing truly terrible with this import but so far >> there is no >> evidence that usage of landcover tags by mappers is growing. >> >> [1] >> >> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2548#issuecomment-469844223 >> >> <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2548#issuecomment-469844223> >> [2] >> >> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2548#issuecomment-470009614 >> >> <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2548#issuecomment-470009614> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
