It is probably similar to "should we map sidewalks as a separate highway=footway" but why not?
See for example tagging in Poland: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.23091&mlon=20.95912#map=19/52.23091/20.95912 There are some reasonable objections (and arguments in support), but "parking zone in a street is not a parking (an specific place for park)" seems weird to me. Parking along street is a specific place for parking, in fact it basically cannot be used for anything except as a place to park vehicles. Mar 6, 2019, 7:21 PM by [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>: > I think it is not correct. Parking zones in a street are not amenity=parking > , are they? It would be very interesting solution...but parking zone in a > street is not a parking (an specific place for park). Parking spaces would > fit correctly, but as you can see not all the parkings zones have drawn all > the parking spaces. > I wish to use standard parking:lane properties...but not with amenity=parking > tag...or is it a correct use? > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
