sent from a phone
> On 7. Mar 2019, at 15:02, Phake Nick <[email protected]> wrote: > > The route us currently operated by two different operators on coordinated > timetable and each operator have their own ETA system. While they do not > provide a GTFS feed for now, it can be expected that each of them will > provide their own feed if they would like to do so in the future. However it > doesn't make sense to have multiple relationship for them as they run on > exact same route with exact same route number and run on a coordinated > schedule IMHO it could make sense to have multiple relations, we will also have multiple GTFS urls in this case. There are route master relations which can group route variants and could be used here as well. A coordinated schedule means they have completely different schedules, right? (although the customers might not care). Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
