> > Il giorno lun 11 mar 2019 alle ore 14:11 Mateusz Konieczny < > matkoni...@tutanota.com> ha scritto: > > Fixed in > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Import&diff=1820348&oldid=1551233 > > I took a 600+ dataset, geocoded them, manually conflate 53 of them, put source references on umap, put source institution name on changeset, ask for some tags clarification (yet didn't receive an agreed feedback). Am I missing something?
The only (sequential) results of this discussion are: - I declare <100 nodes but Volker noticed source dataset has 600+, but then: - I'm asked where the <100 was mentioned (cannot remember), conclusion: I'm malicious: it's an import! - since there is one (1) ML unaswered doubt if "01 Jan - 31 Dec" should be replaced by 24/7: import is anyway bad - pets and childcare information are "volatile" (payment methods aren't? and yet tag exists): import is anyway bad - "bulk" word removed from main import wiki [1]: hence it's obviously an import The lattest is great and leads to grotesque consequences: when a colleague hands me 12 guidepost locations to geocode, I must message planet import ML, local ML, write an import page and ask my fellow a consent form with certified signature. Is this what we aim? I think setting such a binding requirements on small size "imports" is putting a gravestone on many potential small, local sources. Please, forgive my sarcasm, but I'm really discouraged. I published the 53 changeset id's [2]. Feel free to revert. If anybody wants to help me, please feed back on the import doc I wrote on-the-fly [3] [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Import&type=revision&diff=1820348&oldid=1551233 [2] https://ethercalc.org/hpil8syy4rgz.csv [3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Hotels-RAFVG-umap
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
