that look like a bad idea, let's me explain with some ex hrg_landcover for HRGLandCover a made a survey ? surv_landcover a use mapilary ? mpl_landcover ? of course not... fill changeset source in stead of duplicate a tag depending of the source
Le 14.03.19 à 21:28, Lorenzo Stucchi a écrit : > Hi, > > thanks for your ideas. > > From previous messages we think to change the different tag from > landcover to hrg_landcover, the idea came form the professor Brovelli. > Because we can think every type of landcover came from a satellite and > the HRGLandCover (High Resolution Global Land Cover) is more related to > the idea that we want to propose. > > Having that idea, we think that the creation of the tag > org_landcover=barren can be very useful. > > For what concerns the vegetation if the original sense of the two tag is > losted we consider the don’t create the tag. > > Let us known. > Best, > Lorenzo > >> Il giorno 14 mar 2019, alle ore 14:00, Mateusz Konieczny >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> ha scritto: >> >> > This can be hard to identify in large area with not optimal images >> > so the proposal is to create the tag landcover=barren. >> >> If things can not be tagged from aerial images then it is better to >> wait for new ones >> rather than add something like that. >> >> > Two types of classifications exist: >> > natural=wood for not managed woods like for the main part of the >> Amazonia. >> > landuse=forest for managed woods maintained by humans. >> >> both are simply used for tree-covered areas, and distinction between >> them is >> either ignored or interpreted in some many ways that it is simply >> meaningless >> (note many natural=wood in Europe, where it is hard to find forest not >> maintained by humans) >> >> > Also, this information partially needed a local knowledge so the >> more general >> > tag used can be landcover=trees, also quite used as shown in taginfo. >> >> Landcover trees is a rarely used tag, with over half of use in >> Paraguay that is >> result of single series of edits. It is used by tiny minority of mappers. >> >> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=forest >> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/natural=wood >> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landcover=trees >> >> >> >> Mar 13, 2019, 8:49 PM by [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>: >> >> Hi all, >> >> After some discussion about the idea of this project, we think to >> better capt all the idea to create a wiki page with the purpose of >> better understand the problem and find the better way to tag this >> situation. >> >> So we create a wiki page >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PoliMappers/mapping_deforestation >> where >> is possible to discuss these thematics, let us known your idea. >> >> Best Regards, >> Stucchi Lorenzo >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
