I support discouraging both opposite* values. Re-using oneway semantics is easy. oneway is an established tag with established interpretation - if its meaning is not reshaped in an obscure way it is reusable in all its namespace variants with confidence and no frills.
I'm also in favour of a better separation in the documentation to cycleway related tags. The doc should make it clear how and why the concepts differ. Judging from the mailing list discussions most people do not seem to get the intention of the different tagging schemes available, or more loosely even tend to claim that there is no difference involved at all. Another lesson learnt, is that a documented list of values absolutely should be accompanied by a claim of whether that list is open to additions or not. For example, some tagging schemes loose their descriptive power if the set of values is overloaded with this and that and then whatnot. Greetings > On 03/17/19, 09:50, Markus wrote: > > I support discouraging cycleway=opposite. This tag gets too often > confused with cycleway=opposite_lane. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging