Hello, Le 25.03.19 à 00:34, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit :
> Are there people who think it is necessary to map the actual > over-water path of the ferry with relations, or should the wiki page > be clarified to recommend that this be tagged as a linear way? did you mean "don't map route=ferry as relation but only if the way have the route tag put in a relation for all-except ferry ?" it seem that some mappers are using relation https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/route=ferry https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Hkz 1569 relation for route=ferry + 239 route_master osm-carto may of course stop the render of ferry route. but I don't see the improvement/rational to keep the render with a way-with-route-tag but not if a relation is used (in this case, way member of course doesn't duplicate relation tag). the rational is unclear https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3726#issuecomment-475943580 On 3/24/19, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would >> not expect or suggest to add buildings and other landbased infrastructure >> (e.g. waiting areas, ticket offices, customs, ...) to the route. >> The latter are part of the port, not the route. So the plateform/waiting area for a route=bus is part of the route relation but not a plateform/waiting area of a route=ferry ? I don't see the rational of having differend rules depending the "vehicule" used. imho the ferry relation MAY (if someone want to add it) have a role plateform Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
