I think that the shop=underwear could be deprecated indeed, as the other tag is similar and more used (and probably more practical as it is a sub-category of clothes shops).
For the underwear or lingerie name, both value are existing for "*clothes=**" (depending if only selling for women or (also) for men). Le mar. 26 mars 2019 à 13:29, Philip Barnes <[email protected]> a écrit : > And shops just selling underwear usually describe themselves as lingerie. > > Phil (trigpoint) > > On Tuesday, 26 March 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > Is there any good reason to use > > > > shop=underwear > > > > rather than > > > > shop=clothes + clothes=underwear > > > > ? > > > > Both describe shop selling primarily underwear, second case seems to be > > more universal to me. > > > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=underwear < > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=underwear> is also far > more popular > > than > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=underwear > > > > -- > Sent from my Sailfish device > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
