On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 8:32 AM Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> wrote: > service=busway/bus seems OK to me (note, I am not a native speaker), > but I am not convinced that it would be very useful.
Perhaps we should recommend service=bus because it is already documented and more common, service=busway is neither documented nor as common. > I would just set appropriate access tags. > > I found also > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368500255#map=19/50.04798/19.92933 > with > > bus:lanes:backward = designated > bus:lanes:forward = designated > psv:lanes:backward = designated > psv:lanes:forward = designated > > I am not sure is it an optimal lane tagging, but in general lane tagging may > be > useful here, maybe more than a new service tag (or in addition to). I'm not sure. These bus rapid transit systems are segregated tracks that only contain bus lanes, with no public lanes (so no cars, no trucks, and no motorcycles). They typically run parallel to the public tracks. In some cities, taxis are allowed, and sometimes this changes over time as city law changes, but still no public traffic. -- Fernando Trebien _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
