sent from a phone
> On 2. Apr 2019, at 20:16, bkil <[email protected]> wrote: > > Namespacing put aside, could you please help me understand the > semantics of this value? Waste in this context should me something > other than the dozens of listed other categories. > > What I think they had in mind was a "mixed" compartment that will get > manually selected later on at a recycling centre. However, it is a > misnomer in this case, so the term "mixed" or "post_selected" would be > much better for this meaning I agree in principle, it is a misnomer and they likely intended „mixed“. With 12 k usage it is not so rare, as the whole recycling: topic is quite in use but not really through the roof, if you think about the potentially mappable occurrences of these: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=recycling%3A recycling:glass has nearly 74k usage and is on top of this list. I would be in favor of changing waste to mixed before it becomes hundreds of thousands. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
