Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Please comment here or on the proposal discussion page: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/camp_site_pitch
Looks good, by and large :) Any reason for using a "camp_pitch:" prefix/namespace instead of generic tagging? A surface is just a surface after all and the information, that it is the surface of a camp_pitch is already given by the camp_site=camp_pitch tagging. So prefixing is redundant at best. In practice this stuff will only lead to some kind of unificatiopn step when processing data. Frankly, I would prefer using generic tags. I already ran into this problem when dealing with website vs. contact:website where I had to implement a special handling for this stuff. Looking at the additional tags I would also suggest to add the following for nodes: * width * length * direction Rationale for this is, that at least here in Germany there are wooden pitches in some backcountry campsites where this information might be very useful. See http://www.naturpark-eifel.de/de/projekte/detail/Eifel-Trekking-32o/ for an image of such a beast. Regards Sven -- Author of http://opencampingmap.org _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
