Whenever the quali ...-reducing is used, I know the stuff or thing actually produces ... where ... is bad.
Mvg Peter Elderson > Op 2 mei 2019 om 23:52 heeft Paul Allen <[email protected]> het volgende > geschreven: > >> On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 22:43, Tobias Wrede <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would question to use any qualification at all. Whatever is now called >> a quiet/whispering/noise reducing asphalt will have become a standard in >> a couple of years and then a new type even more noise reducing will have >> been invented. Will we then have >> noise_reducing_surface=no|little|yes|yes_yes|definitely_yes? > > If we need this tag (I have my doubts) then the only sane way of handling > that would be > something like noise_reduction_db=* where the figure is relative to a > "normal" surface > (e.g., smooth concrete) measured at some specified distance. I'll leave it > to the > specialists to come up with those conditions. > > I really doubt we need it. People are unlikely to choose a minimum-noise > route even if > their satnav offered the option, not if it means the journey is longer or > slower. People > living nearby who are actually affected by road noise will know whether they > have a loud > road or a quiet one without our help. We won't be able to tell if the tag > applies from > satellite imagery. It will be hard to verify unless a community proudly puts > up signs > announcing they've spent money on such a surface. OTOH, people tag things > like > this just because they can, so we'll probably have to come up with something > sane here > before people make tags up at random. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
